Cooperation and Cognition

Read full text
Authors: Ron Barzel
Cited by: 0

Abstract

This project tests a model of cooperation in which breaking an explicit cooperative promise (“defection”) carries a cognitive cost, and individuals anticipate and manage that cost when deciding how to act. Participants complete an online experiment (implemented in Gorilla and run on Prolific) that combines memory tasks with a one-shot trust game. The key manipulation is the size of a bonus for a second memory test offered later in the study ($1 vs $20). The central prediction is that a larger downstream bonus will reduce the rate of promise-breaking in the trust game. We will test our primary hypothesis with a preregistered logistic regression predicting Defection from Condition (low vs high bonus), supplemented by a two-proportion test and pre-specified robustness analyses that re-code Defection among promisors only and, descriptively, separate non-promisers from promise-keepers and defectors.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Publication details

Journal / source
OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Publication date
27 January 2026
Document type
Preprint