Load and psychophysiological responses in high-intensity interval training with fixed and self-selected recovery

Authors: Leandro de Oliveira Sant’Ana, Jeferson Macedo Vianna, Fabiana Rodrigues Scartoni, Géssyca Tolomeu de Oliveira, Bruna Macedo Carvalho, Marconi De Sena Altomar, Diogo Santos Teixeira, Raul Antunes, Filipe Rodrigues, Rui Matos, Jefferson da Silva Novaes, Sergio Eduardo de Carvalho Machado
+1 more Diogo Monteiro
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Objective. The study analyzed the training load in high-intensity interval training sessions with different conditions of recovery time between stimuli: fixed (1min.) and self-selected. Methods. Nineteen individuals participated in the study: 13 men and 6 women (19±1.0 years; 64.0±9.2 kg; 169±8.5 cm; 22.0±2 BMI). For the training load analysis, heart rate variability (LnRMSSD), perceived effort (PE), and mood scale BRUMS (MS) were used. LnRMSSD and MS were evaluated before and after the sessions. The PE was evaluated during each session immediately after each stimulus. The protocol was 10 x 30s (95% Vpeak) with active recovery (40% Vpeak) in fixed or self-selected time. ANOVA-RM (2 [interventions] x 2 [time points]) for LnRMSSD and MS and (2 [interventions] x 10 [time points]) for PE was used. Results. Between condition and time*condition, no differences were observed for LnRMSSD (p=.626; p=.879, respectively), PE (p=.191; p=.792, respectively), and MS (tension: p=.673; p=.463; depression: p=.867; p=.359; anger: p=.867; p=.359; vigor: p=.811; p=.778; fatigue: p=.144; p=.998; mental confusion: p=.828; p=.752, respectively). In terms of time, significant differences were observed in LnRMSSD (p

Fields of Study & Subjects

Sports Performance and Training Cardiovascular and exercise physiology Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Publication details

Journal / source
Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN