Оцінка рівня технічної підготовленості кваліфікованих борців греко-римського стилю

Purpose: to assess the level of technical preparedness of qualified Greco-Roman wrestlers in the training process using expert evaluation. Material and Methods. A review of scientific and methodological literature was conducted to identify informative indicators of technical-tactical skills and to justify the use of expert evaluation as a method of control. The level of technical preparedness was determined during controlled bouts using a 5-point scale by three experts with more than five years of coaching experience. The analysis included evaluation of the quality of technical-tactical actions, accuracy of distance selection, preparation of attacking actions, combinational techniques, and the structure of the wrestlers’ technical arsenal. Results: expert evaluation demonstrated a sufficient level of technical preparedness among Greco-Roman wrestlers. The highest scores were observed for the quality of technical-tactical actions (3,9 points), while the lowest were for the preparation of attacking actions (3,5 points). The accuracy of distance selection and combinational techniques scored 3,7 points each, indicating a relatively even development of key components of preparedness, although attacking action preparation requires improvement. Analysis of the technical arsenal structure showed an average volume of 3.6 points and a stance-to-parterre action ratio of 4,1 points, reflecting balanced technical actions but somewhat limited repertoire diversity. Correlation analysis revealed moderate positive relationships between individual indicators, including quality of execution and distance selection (r=0,42), quality and combinational actions (r=0,48), and distance selection and preparation of attacking actions (r=0,51), highlighting the close interaction of components in attack execution. At the same time, the absence of statistically significant relationships between quantitative and qualitative indicators of the technical arsenal indicates a multi-component and relatively autonomous nature of technical preparedness. Conclusions. The study confirmed a sufficient level of technical preparedness among qualified Greco-Roman wrestlers, with predominant development in the quality of technical-tactical actions and balanced structure of the technical arsenal. The findings emphasize the need for improvement in the preparation of attacking actions and for comprehensive monitoring of athletes’ technical mastery during the training process.