Testimony of Professor Zalman Rothschild Before the House Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education Regarding Mahmoud v. Taylor

Authors: Zalman Rothschild
Cited by: 0

Abstract

On February 10, 2026, Professor Zalman Rothschild, Horn Family Distinguished Research Scholar in Law and Religion at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, testified before the House Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education of the House Committee on Education and Workforce. His testimony addressed the Supreme Court’s decision in Mahmoud v. Taylor and its implications for parental rights, religious liberty, public education, vaccination mandates, and compulsory schooling. Professor Rothschild situates Mahmoud within the broader constitutional tradition shaped by Pierce v. Society of Sisters, West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, and Wisconsin v. Yoder, arguing that the decision departs from longstanding limits on parental opt-out rights. He warns that expanding constitutionalized parental exemptions may undermine public health laws, compulsory education requirements, and the stability of public institutions.

Fields of Study & Subjects

American Constitutional Law and Politics Legal Issues in Education Religious Freedom and Discrimination

Publication details

Journal / source
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Publication date
10 February 2026
Language
EN