Analyzing Minnick v. California Using ChatGPT

Read full text
Authors: Nicholas Malkov
Cited by: 0

Abstract

This assignment in the Race and Ethnicity course asks students to critically analyze the Supreme Court case Wayne Minnick et al. v. California Department of Corrections et al. through a structured case brief and ethical use of AI. Students examine key legal elements of the case while exploring issues of race, ethnicity, and institutional discrimination in the correctional system. After briefing the case, students use AI tools to generate and revise discussion questions that deepen analysis of themes such as racial discrimination, intersectionality, sentencing, advocacy, and policy reform. The assignment emphasizes critical thinking, legal analysis, and responsible AI engagement.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Legal Education and Practice Innovations Artificial Intelligence in Law Artificial Intelligence in Education

Publication details

Journal / source
CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York)
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN