Effect of Using Either Synovex Primer or Synovex Choice Compared to Not Implanting on the Performance of Growing Steers

Authors: Sawyer D. Starrett, Rebecca L McDermott, Sofia Suarez Lorences, Pedro Henrique Jota Fernandes, Dirk B. Burken, Jessica L Sperber, Galen Edward Erickson, Jim C. MacDonald
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Summary with Implications A 120-day winter-growing study utilized 576 head of steers to evaluate three dry lot implant strategies on the growth of steers. The three implanting strategies included a non-implanted control, Synovex® Primer™, or Synovex Choice®. While on harvested corn residue fields, steers were supplemented with 4 lb Sweet Bran and 0.375 lb of a vitamin and mineral package. The targeted gain for the non-implanted control was 1.25 lb/d. Both Synovex Primer and Synovex Choice increased ADG over the non-implanted control cattle by 7.5% and 12.7%, respectively. Additionally, Synovex Choice had a 4.8% increase in ADG over Synovex Primer. Steer ADG increased linearly (P < 0.01) in a dose-dependent manner to increasing implant dose during the dry lot phase.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Lincoln (University of Nebraska)
Publication date
1 January 2026