Правила медіації як інструмент організації присудової медіації

The article examines the content and functions of mediation rules as a key instrument for structuring court-connected mediation. It argues that, while legislative regulation of mediation is generally framework-based—focused on fundamental principles, mediator qualifications, and guarantees of confidentiality—the mediation rules themselves play a decisive role in ensuring procedural justice, predictability, and legitimacy of the process. The study’s methodological foundation combines the concept of procedural justice with approaches from general legal theory, viewing rules as institutional mechanisms for securing due process within flexible procedures. The empirical basis of the research includes the UNCITRAL Mediation Rules and the mediation rules of leading institutions (ICC, WIPO, CEDR), as well as court-connected mediation rules in Italy and the United States. Comparative analysis identified common structural elements of mediation rules (initiation, appointment of mediator, confidentiality, termination, and fees) and specific features of the court-connected model—namely, a higher level of procedural detail, regulation of communication between the court and the mediator, requirements for party and representative participation, the existence of official registers of mediators and mediation centers, and an established system of reporting and quality control. The study demonstrates that the detailed nature of court-connected mediation rules does not constrain procedural flexibility; rather, it serves as a means of realizing their guarantee, legitimizing, coordinating, and informational functions. Such rules ensure a balance between party autonomy and procedural rigor, strengthen judicial and party confidence in mediation, and contribute to the quality and reliability of mediation services. The findings confirm the hypothesis that mediation rules within court-connected mediation possess distinctive features shaped by their alignment with procedural norms of judicial proceedings.